|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
Caucasoid/Elamitoid Polytheistic Bovine Cults |
||||||||||||||
|
|
Agrarian Cults of Prehistoric herbivorous Plant-Gatherers and Vegeral Farmers |
||||||||||||||
|
|
Phytototemism: belief in totem ancestors in the reincarnation
of plants, flowers, shrubs and trees Polytheism: cults of
many celestial and subterranean deities Chthonism: cults of Mother Earth
and the underworld deities (from Greek χθών (khthṓn, “ground, soil”) Elementalism: belief in four primordial
elements: air, earth, water and fire Naturism: belief in natural elements
of the nature (from Latin natura “nature”)
Hylozoism: belief in the spiritual
nature of matter (from Greek hylos “matter”) |
Phytomorphism: belief in postmortal transformations into plants, shrubs and trees Manism: cults of ancestral spirits of dead
fathers (Latin manes “spirit of the
ancestors”) Bovinism: cults of bovine deities
(bulls, cows, calves) Passionalism: worshiping
martyr gods of corn, death, sacrifice and suffering
Eleotheism: worshiping female goddesses of love and mercy
(from Greek έλεος, éleos “mercy”) Endophagism: the rite of endophagia, eating the dead
body of fathers and ancestors |
|||||||||||||
|
Table 1. The Distribution of Acheulean Cleaver Finds (1.76-0.13 Mya) (Wikipedia Commons online) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Map 2. The
distribution of Elamitoid and Caucasoid farmers
with bull-leaping, bovine cults and flat-roofed labyrinths (Pavel Bělíček: The Synthetic Classification of Human Phenotypes and Varieties. Prague 2018,
p. 94, Map 11) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
The
Caucasoids and Elamitoids:
The Family-Tree of Agrarian tribes
The language identity of
Indo-European peasants can be detected according to the simple i-a-u vocalism, rich vocalic quantity and a
series of two-mora or three-mora
falling diphthongs ai → ē,
au → ō, which was suitable for hymns in quantitative
prosody. It operated in Old Gothic and Ancient Greek but also in Old Indian
and Classic Arabic as it was the common heritage of the Neolithic Europoid and Caucasoid peasantry. Later assaults of
Asiatic herdsmen subjected peasantry to serfdom and suppressed their quantitative
hymnology by the predominance of rhymed or alliterative syllabo-tonic
epic.
Table 28. The family-tree of axe-tool
cultures Close kinship between European, Anatolian, Mesopotamian and Caucasian
agriculturalists is proved also by their genetic family-trees that stem from
the archaic Y DNA haplogroup IJ. Its haplotype is ancestor to the three ethnic and cultural
complexes: the Caucasoid populations with the type J-P209, the Danubian farmers with the Linear Ware pottery (Linearbandkeramic) and the genetic Y DNA haplotype I2-M438 and the Scandinavian Corded Ware with
the haplogroup I1-M253. Their complexes can be
recognised also according to the morphology of housing types. Their earliest
archetype indicates a large rectangular collective longhouse that is
compatible with the Amazonian peasants’ maloca
and dwellings of Melanesian agriculturalists (Y DNA haplogroup
M-P256). Comparison to Melanesian peoples is of great import as the IJ and
IJK-L15 haplogroups are genetically interrelated
with the Melanesian haplotype M-L15. In the
Neolithic the rectangular longhouses fell into three special subtypes. The
Anatolian and Mesopotamian Caucasoids inhabited
multi-cellular labyrinths in tell-mound sites and rectangular flat-roofed
houses made from rammed clay pisé. The Danubian Linear Ware people lived in rectangular
longhouses with monopitched roofs in fertile
riverside valleys, while the Scandinavian Nordics adhered to archaic
three-aisled terps with A-frame roofs on seaside
dunes.
Table 30. The cultural paradigm of
Eurasian agrarian axe-tool tribes The Diaspora of Elamitoid Caucasoids
Table 25. Farmers stemming from the Epi-Acheulean
axe-tool tradition (from P.
Bělíček: The Analytic Survey of European
Anthropology, Prague 2019,
p. 73) |
|
Elamitoid Bull-Fighters
and Bull-Leapers in Iberia, Italy, Crete and
Andalusian
farmers on the Iberian peninsula were not kneaded out of the same dough as
the Neolithic Dannubian agriculturalists but
descended from oriental rootage. They did not
inherit the Central European traditions of the Linear Band Ware but profiled
as heirs of Anatolian field-cultivators. They showed consanguinity to the
stock of oriental Elamitoid peoples, who lived
along the long belt of arid dryland regions
spanning from Asia Minor to India. Their cultural morphology reflected arid
dry-land cultivation with inevitable irrigation and other methods of
watering. Their common
characteristic traits were flat-roofed multicellular
houses on artificial elevated mounds. The Spanish invention of agriculture
probably drew inspiration from Africa but its penetration was not possible
without local populations of autochthonous Acheulean
plant-gatherers. They welcomed progress in tilling the land because they
relied on vegetal sustenance and possessed innate preagriculturalist
dispositions. The advent of the Neolithic agriculturalist technocomplex
La Almagra (6,000 BC) may be
explained as an import from the Iberomaurusian
culture in North Africa. Its name suggested almagra
‘red ochre’ and derived from the production of red pottery. It was
painted by special ochre dye appreciated by tribes of Tungids
as a sacral blessing. Spanish
links with oriental agrarian cultures were manifested in the cult of bovine
divinities associated with bull-fighting, bull leaping and bull running known
from Pamplona festivals. The bull embodied the supreme celestial deity
identical to the Greek Zeus residing on the sacred mountain Olympos. (from P. Bělíček: The Analytic Survey of European Anthropology,
Prague 2019, pp. 131-132) Hittite Elamitoids are the race of Neolithic farmers of Acheulean origin that are called Caucasoids,
Elamitoid, Ethiopids or Gothonids. They built mound tell-sites with
multi-roomed flat-roofed labyrinths made out clay, pisé
and sundried bricks. They were distinguished from
other tribes by bull cults, bull-leaping, boucrania
and subterranean sanctuaries for offerings of bulls. They included Aethiopes, Aigyptoi
and Adiabara, in north eastern Africa and
tribes of Catabanenses, Catai,
Cattabeni in the Arabian Peninsula.
In the (from P. Bělíček: The Differential Analysis of the Wordwide Human Varieties. Prague 2018, p. 26) Indic Elamitoids
with b-plurals
India is well-known as a country of bovine
cults, where the Indic zebu cows freely range along streets as sacred
untouchable beings without being disturbed by passers-by. Their ritual adoration
is an indispensable part of bull cults, bull fighting and bull leaping
peculiar to all Elamitoid cultures with flat-roof
architecture. The initiation rites of adolescent youngsters with ceremonial
bull-leaping are not so common as in Ethiopia but their occurrence was
reliably evidenced in the Mohenjo daro civilisation. They are engraved on a seal from Banawali (c. 2100 BC) that depicts an acrobat jumping
from the back of a bull and landing in front. Modern survivals of
bull-fighting are preserved in the jallikattu
festival held as homage to Krishna. It is associated with bull-taming,
bull-grabbing or bull-grappling, when two youths catch and grab a bull. In the state Tamil Nadu it is
celebrated as a four-day long harvest festival pongal
with motifs of Krishna’s wedding
ceremony.1 Krishnaism and
its bovine cults were wide-spread among the Elamitoid
factions of Dravidians, who tilled the land as peasants and formed the
popular substratum of rural village communities. Their populations were
abundant in Myanmar, southern India and Harappan
city-states. Their ethnic customs
bore much resemblance to peasantry in Iranian Susiana,
Ubaidans in Mesopotamia and Hittite farmers in
Anatolia. Their spiritual culture celebrated flourishing heydays India with the
rise of Neolithic pottery and agriculture remarkable for the use of Macrolithic and Gigantolithic handaxes. They enjoyed collective life in tell-site
settlements and multi-roomed labyriths with flat-roofage. The Neolithic revival did not dawn at random,
it obviously grew out of the earlier autochthonous populations of axe-tool
makers and plant-gatherers. Their masses probably came with the advent of Acheulean tribes about 800,000 BP and ranged as far as
the Movius line intersecting Burma. Their hallmark
was seen in sophisticated hand-axe bifaces of Acheulean Mode 2. Acheulean
cultures came into existence in Ethiopia and southern Arabia by permeating
the earlier colonisations of Oldowans with
Levalloisian flake-tool manufacturers. Their people were remarkable for dolichocephalic and mildly hypsicranic
skulls, taller stature, brachyskelic figure, long
straight narrow nose and light brown skin. There exist also surprising parallels
between Caucasian and European peasant tribes’ ethnonymy,
which may be taken for convincing testimony of common kinship. The Indian
subcontinents was visited by two related races of taller leptorrhine
dolichocephals with preagricultural
dispositions, European Gothids with the Y-haplotypes I1, I2 and Oriental Gothonids
with the Y-haplogroups J1, J2. The Indo-European Gothids were called Geto-Persians
(later also Khattri-Brahmans) and imported cordmarked
pottery that imitated baste-bound wooden tubs. The Oriental Gothonids were called Gutio-Farsians
and manufactured pottery with chessmat patterns
derived from baskets with reed-matting. Both branches originated in South
Arabia but the former made for Anatolia, whereas the latter headed for
Mesopotamia. After installing a plantation in Elam and Susiana
they continued to the IndusValley and southern
India. The Neolithic Revolution woke them up as Dravidian land-tillers and
hoe-cultivators. The Kodagu, Kota, Kodava and Kadar
settled down in southwest India, while Gadaba, Gutob, Odisha, and Parji dropped anchor in southeast India. Most of them
retained ergative languages with absolutive and
oblique cases and preserved their archaic animate b-plurals. Owing to f-plurals, the Brahui
stock may be also counted to Elamitoids. They
originally belonged to the Quettans and resembled Harappan farmers in the Indus Valley but afterwards they
fell victims of Turcoid raiders, who turned their
majority into pastoralist herders. Among Caucasian nations there was a
large group of lhbanguages with p/b-plurals.
It included Georgian, Zan, Mingrelian,
Ginukh, Gunzib, Dido, Tsakhur, Godoberi, Akhvakh, Chamalal (Table 28). Bedřich Hrozný scented p/b-plurals
even in their tribal neighbours Kaspioi and Lullubei although they belonged to the Altaic
stock of Kassites. Kaspioi
were just inimical raiders, their common genuine endonyms
comprised ethnic names such as Aigyptoi, Koptoi, Gutti, Hatti, Hittites, Kodagu,
Kota, Gadaba and Khonde.
These
tribes pertained to the trueborn core of oriental Neolithic farmers in the
Fertile Crescent, who created the culture of Mesopotamian and later also
Amerindian Basket-Makers. They excelled in basketry and textile weaving using
herbal materials accessible in the marshlands surrounding the estuary of big
rivers of Mesopotamia. Their basketry invented the art of weaving reed-stalks
into chessboard patterns. Such technique was typical of the Near East farmers
as well as the Anasazi basket-makers in North and
Central America. It was imitated by ornamental patterns on pottery. These cultures were notable
mainly for speaking languages with b-plurals and indulgence in
flat-roof architecture. Their multi-roomed houses with uncountable annexes
had doorless and windowless walls because they were
accessed on ladders from above. Their travels to the northeast areas set out
on several routes. One route led northward along the western coasts of the
Caspian Sea. Another corridor of migrations proceeded through Burma to south
China. The invention of pottery with chessboard patterns was an early
Neolithic discovery but the skills of basketry were cultivated as early as
the Upper Neolithic. The Amerindian Basket-Makers arrived in the New World as
late as in the 9th millennium BC but their travels to Burma and
China must have occurred in earlier periods. Grave suspicions identify their
steps with Acheulean plant-collectors, who
colonised the Far East about 800,000 BC. At that time they transgressed the Hallam L. Movius’s line in
Burma and proceeded northward as afar as Korea. Typical Acheulean
artefacts were excavated in the Chinese sites Bose,
Luonan, Sanmenxia and
DRR.
Table 34. Y-DNA haplogroup frequencies in Harappan
Caucasoids with the J-haplogroup and
b-plurals (Gadaba, Kota). Dravido-Elamite J-stream (Macrolithic
Dravidians with b-plurals and J-haplogroups):
Kodagu, Kolami, Gadaba, Purji. Burmese Elamitoids/Europids 1: Purum, Kadu 3 ´, Burmese, Parauk Wa, Prai,
Pray, Prai 2 ´, Prao, Kaco‘, W-Bru 2 ´, E-Bru 2 ´, W-Bru, Kataang, Brao, W- Katu, Katua, E-Katu Burmese Elamitoids/Europids 2: Atong 3 ´, Kok Borok 2 ´, Koda 2 ´, Barisal 3 ´. (from P. Bělíček: The Differential Analysis of the Wordwide Human Varieties. Prague 2018, p. 134-136) |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
