|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Asia |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Italy Schweiz |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ancient Greek Tribes Clickable terms are red on yellow background |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Tribes of
Ancient (from Pavel Bělíček: The
Analytic Survey of European Anthropology, Prague 2018, Map 45, p. 151) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Ethnic Classification of Greeks
In popular superstitions as well as in
traditional linguistic studies Greeks are considered as an independent
offshoot of the Indo-European family. Comparative grammar believes that about
3000 BC it split off as a domain of Proto-Greek or Hellenic in the southern
Balkans. The chief argument confirming the purported ethnic unity of Greek is
seen in the cultural integrity of myths and legends.1 Only few adherents of linguistic
glottochronology such as R. Gray and Q. Atkinson propose hypotheses of an Anatolian
Graeco-Armenian family. Apart of such attempts Greeks are standardly treated
as one compact ethnic group with several synonymous denominations. Their most
common name Greeks (Greek Graikoi) is generally identified with the
alternative catch-word Hellenes (Greek Έλληνες) but their ethnic labels collide with
conventions of Homeric ethnonymy. In
his Iliad and Odyssey Homer refers to Trojan heroes as Achaeans (Ἀχαιοί, Akhaioí) and only once he
mentions Panhellenes (Πανέλληνες)
and Hellenes. With moderate frequency he called his own
countrymen also Argives (Greek Argeioi ‘inhabitants of In times when The crucial difficulty obviously consists
in the ethnic diversity of the earliest Greek inhabitants. The Pelasgian Sea
Peoples (les peuples de la mer)6
had a brotherly moiety of Danaans. The tribal moieties of Argives and
Mycenaeans are surmised to have derived their ethnonyms from a Mycenaean
loanword for megalithic castle fortifications built by Cyclopes between 1600
and 1300 BC. Their etymology is probably paralleled by Anatolian Mysians and
Ugarites, who represented the two main brotherly phratries of megalithic
tumulus cultures and showed their remote Ugro-Scythian origin. Such
ethnonymic pairs crop up also in the names of other megalith-builders such as
Abkhaz, Basques, Scots and mythic ‘ogres’. Most
ancient tribes exhibited a long-term existence lasting for ages and evidenced
tribal identity by their ethnonymy. As their ethnonyms showed incredible
stability, they cannot be explained by Max Müller’s aetiologism and simple
natural ad hoc etymologies. Pelasgian and Dorian were originally
non-Greek foreign languages absorbed by the Greek cultural medium and
secondarily Hellenised into Greek dialects. Julius Pokorny derived the
etymology of Dorian from Classic Greeks called themselves Hellenes
because their ethnic element won in competition with other tribal minorities.
They won in social struggles thanks to the process of demotisation
perceptible in Periclean A plausible solution of the Greek ethnic
crux was foreseen by Aristotle3. He sought the cradle of Hellenes in the region |
|
Table 45. The interdisciplinary transitions of evolutionary
categories in Ancient The subcategorisation of Greek ethnicities
Table 45 sketches ethnic interrelations in the general framework of Greek
cultural studies. The dominant ethnicity was represented by the short-sized
Hellenic Alpinids with brachycephalous skulls and cremation rituals. They
formed the peaceful plebeian race of Hellenes that exhibited
short-sized Lapponoid countenance with broad round heads, short legs and
concave noses. They had nothing to do with the Dorian militant slave-holders
or the proud aristocratic Achaeans residing in unconquerable castles. The Illyrian
myths about the descent of Achaeans and Dorians from Hellenes could reflect
only their local social prevalence in The Ancient Greek society was composed of
several heterogeneous components and their analytic decomposition has to
start from the earliest Palaeolithic beginnings. Table 46 sketches a handy
ethnic typology tracing Greek plantations back to the Neolithic peasantry and
autochthonous prehistoric plant-gatherers. Their Eleusinian mysteries had
much to do with Minoan cults in
Table 46. The cultural typology
of Greek tribes |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Greek Divine
Genealogies
In ancient Greek legends the first celestial divinities were Aether,
Uranos, Cronos and Zeus. Their divine family started from Chaos, who gave
birth to Erebos (Underworld) and Nyx (Night). Their son was Aether, Αἰθήρ,
who is interpreted as ‘air’ or ‘upper sky’ lying over the air ἀήρ. “From Chaos came forth
Erebus and black Night; but of Night were born Aether and Day, whom she
conceived and bare from union in love with Erebus.”1 Aether had his own cults and seems to
be the first real ethnic reference to the Boeotian mythical Hektones,
who were dubbed and erroneously nicknamed Hecatoncheires
(Hundred-Handed Ones). In some myths Aether’s
took to wife the ‘wide-bosomed’ Gaia or Γῆ (Earth), a Greek
equivalent of the Roman Terra. They represented the first generation of gods
corresponding to the Egyptian couple Nut (Sky) and Geb (Earth). Such cults of
Mother Earth indicated the primordial role of Neolithic farmers associated
with the advent of Anatolian tribes to In his Works and Days Hesiod collected
fragmentary popular myths into a connected chronology that served as a germ
for beginnings of Greek historiography. Its backbone introduced periodisation
into epochs of the Golden and Silver Age. In his account Gaia bare her son
Uranos (starry Heaven), who symbolised the Bronze Age. He was hated as a
procreator of the evil Cyclopes. They made weapons out of alloys of copper
with tin and flooded Cronos
fell in love with his sister Rhea, took her to wife, and they together bare
their son Zeus. When Zeus was a little boy, Rhea hid him away from Cronos
lest he were abused by his father. Zeus contrived against Cronos and kicked
up a riot that ended with jailing Cronos in Tartarus. Their conflict was
described in the lost epic Titanomachia composed by Eumelus of
Corinth. At first Zeus’ government in Olympos provided flowering designated as the Silver
Age (argirón génos) but later among people there arose discontent and
riots that were punished by the Ogygian Deluge. Such family quarrels
contained a lot of fabled superstitions but mixed with grains of historical
truth. They were described as events that occurred in the royal dynasty
reigning on Olympos. It served as a sacred mount with cultic groves visited
by pilgrims on ritual occasions. It acted as the seat of Greek Pantheon
worshipped by the Anatolian peasants. It intermingled all Greek deities into
a personal union and one large family of in-laws although it was clear that
they descended from different clans, ethnic factions and racial minorities.
Like all royal dynasties they closed exogamous marriage contracts with
opposite tribes in order to befriend them as allies. In mythological optics
all legendary heroes were depicted as giants because they were seen from the
dwarfish perspective of short-sized Hellenes. In fact, among these
tribal groups there were permanent cruel wars raging. Epic poetry reported
their course as civil rebellions of Theomachy, Gigantomachy and Titanomachy.
Their accidents bore resemblance to customs ruling in Hebroid countries of
the
Table 47. The subcategorisation
of Ancient Greek cultural and mythological cycles |
|
The real historical background of such
motifs must be reconstructed by turning aside familial skirmishes and
focusing on tribal groups. The first autochthones in ancient The spelling Hecatoncheires
evidently arose as a false popular contortion of the correct spelling
Hektones. Popular fantasies depicted them as giant monsters instead of
conveying the veritable communication that they lived in collective
longhouses inhabited by a great families with as many as a hundred relatives,
as it was common among the Neolithic Linear Ware farmers. They must have
looked like Danubian Nordids and amazing notices concerning their giant or
gigantic figure mirrored only the fact that the Neolithic farmers were tall
dolichocephals of robust and strong figure. So it was no wonder that
neighbours described them as three giants of great strength. Hesiod’s Theogony
maintained that Uranos was conceived by Gaia alone,1 but
other sources reported that his real father was Aether. 2 The
etymology of Gyges stemmed from the compound ‘earth-born’. Some Classic and
Hellenistic pictures and statuettes depicted Gigantes as chthonic
earth-born creatures that crept out of volcanoes or other holes in the earth
and had snakes instead of legs. As seen in the Minoan figurines of a snake
goddess with the crown of hair swarming with snakes, serpents symbolised
subterrestrial servants of the Mother Earth. Neolithic peasantry revered
serpents as their tribal totemistic symbols and chthonic tutelary spirits.
“Archaic and Classical representations show Gigantes as man-sized hoplites (heavily armed ancient Greek foot
soldiers) fully human in form.”3
Hoplites were middle-class farmers, who did not possess horses, so they had
to fight with common foot soldiers. Myths about Gigantomachia left many
unclarities but looked like legends about peasants’ rebellions waging a civil
war against the oppression of Olympian gods. Some authors made it clear that Gigantes
revolted against Titanids and took part in Titanomachia. Other
notices suggest that they were born from drops of blood falling down to the
earth after the castration of Uranos. The general impression implies that
their tribal deities were Aether, Zeus, Demeter and Persephone. At last the
giants’ revolt was vanquished and their dead bodies were buries under
volcanoes. The first alien invaders
of ancient Cyclopes intimidated their neighbours as robust
one-eyed giants indulging in building large megalith constructions called ‘Cyclopean stones’ and ‘Cyclopean wallstones’. Their architecture was remarkable for drystone walls,
copula-shaped roofs and vaulted ceilings. In An additional criterion of ethnic
classification may be found in residual consonantal nominal stems and plurals
(Table 48). Ancient Greek nouns had Sarmatoid t/d-stems,
Abkhazo-Median m/nk/k-stems, Turcoid r-stems,
Lydian l-stems and Hellenic o-stems with i/oi-plurals.
Such stems predefine their classification. GREEKS ® k-Cyclopes + i-Hellenes
+ r-Dorians + l-Pelasgians l-Pelasgians ® Paeones,
Pelasgiotes + Danaïdes + Karoi + Leleges r-Dorians ® Doroi, Tauroi + Kimmerioi + Greeks, Geryones
k-Cyclopes ® Thracians + Bessoi, Mysioi, Mosxoi i-Hellenes ® Galatians, Hellenes + Ionoi (<
*Jav/Alban) + Aeolians Aetolians (<
*Ant) Table 48. Greek ethnicities classified by stems and plural endings |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Cimbroid Graecians
Greek myths assume that the earliest
autochthones of In ancient Sextus Africanus found out
that people in The Bronze Age archaeology of
ancient Graecoids. Irrespective of how close
the relation of Minyans to the Graikoi might be, the cultural
morphology of Minyans in the Early Helladic period exhibited strong
similarity to Natufian sites in Titanids. Such differentiation
affected also microlithic cultures and Turcoid tribes in the The Greek Titanids must have been their
remote relatives, because Poseidon was a Titanid holding control over the
oceans. Their fishing techniques did not use angling but Poseidon’s trident
fishspear resemblant to the three-pronged fishing spear leister of
Germanic Teutons. This manner of fishing suggests consanguinity with the
northern bog-people with pointed-bottom pottery and the Y-haplogroup R1a.
Their affinity to the The Turcoid native cradleland lay
somewhere in the Altai Mountains and its Microlithic industry came into being
as a side splinter of the Denisovan Leptolithic flake-tools cultivated by
ancestors of Tungusoid fishers. The race of Turanids took to living in rock
shelters in caves or under rock overhangs and fishing in Trans-Caspian marshlands.
Greek Graecians and Dorians originally made their living by herding. The
former were Graecoids, who sprang from Hebrew drylanders with burnished ware
and Y-haplogroup R1b.
|
|
Cimbrians (microlithic ware,
goat herding, round stone towers and semicircular horseshoe apsidas, grey
burnished ware in imitation of metallic bowls, sickles inlaid with microlith
blades, water wells and tsenotes with hoards, three-pronged fishing
spear, Poseidon’s trident, Germanic Teutons’ leister, fallic cults,
terminal milestones hermai, artificial pederasty, abusing page-boys
for fellation. Graecoids (round stone
towers, horseshoe apsidas, grey burnished ware), ▪ Titans (< Typhon, Taautus,
Teutones) [ ▪ Graecians (Γραικοί)
in ▪
Dorians [Doris, ▪ Cydonians (< Cydon, son of Hermes,
Chanians [northwestern ▪ Geryonides (cliff-dwellers, pirates,
submarine caves, shaft graves), deities Typhon (Τυφών,
Typhaeus), Lernaean Hydra [ Table
50. A classification of Greek Cimbroids The Early Helladic population lived in
circular stone houses reminiscent of round houses in The population of Ancient Greece consisted
of two ethnicities descending from Mesolithic microlith cultures, the Dorian
and Graecoid drylanders and the sea people of Titanids headed by Cronos and
Poseidon. The former branch developed from the Kebaran and Natufian
Microlithic in the Extract
from Pavel Bělíček:
The Analytic Survey of European Anthropology, Prague 2018, pp. 145-155. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Tacit, Germ. 2.
2 Jacob Grimm: Deutsche Mythologie Göttingen, 1835.
3 William Stubbs: Constitutional
History of England, I, 1880, p. 38.
4 Friedrich Maurer: Nordgermanen und Alemannen: Studien
zur germanischen und frühdeutschen Sprach-geschichte, Stammes- und
Volkskunde.
5 Tacit, Germ. 2.
6 Plinius,
Naturalis historia
37, 35; Ptolemaeus 2, 11, 9.
7 Plinius,
Naturalis historia 4, 100.
1 Plinius, Naturalis historia
I, 1.
2 Friedrich Maurer: Nordgermanen und Alemannen: Studien
zur germanischen und frühdeutschen Sprach-geschichte, Stammes- und
Volkskunde. Bern: A. Francke, 1952, pp. 175-178.
1 Ferdinand Wrede: Ingwäonisch und
Westgermanisch. Zeitschrift für deutsche Mundarten, 1924: 270-283; V. M.
Zhirmunski: Deutsche Mundartkunde. Berlin 1962.
2 Carol Henriksen – Johan van der Auwera:
1. The Germanic Languages. In: Johan van der Auwera, ed. The
Germanic Languages. London, New York: Routledge, 1994, 2013, pp. 1-18.
p. 9.
3 Ferdinand Wrede: Ingwäonisch und
Westgermanisch. Zeitschrift für deutsche Mundarten, 1924: 270-283; T.
Frings: Grundlegung einer Geschichte der deutschen Sprache. Halle 1957.;
V.
M. Zhirmunski: Deutsche Mundartkunde. Berlin 1962, p. 50-51.
4 Strabo, Geography 7.2.2; Diodorus
Siculus, Bibl.5.32.4; Plutarch, Vit.Mar. 11.11.
1
Anthony D. Smith: Myths
and Memories of the Nation. Oxford Univ.
Press, 1999.
2 Jorrit M. Kelder: The Egyptian Interest in Mycenaean Greece. JEOL (Jaarbericht Ex Oriente Lux), 2010, pp. 125–140.
3 Homer: Odyssey, book XIX, line 175-177.
4 Op. cit., book XIX, line 176.
5 Herodotus: The Histories, book VII, section 73.
6 Edward Lipinsky: Peuples de la mer, Phéniciens, Puniques: Etudes d'épigraphie et d'histoire méditerranéenne. Peeters, Louvin, 2015.
7 Julius Pokorny: Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch, 1959; English edition: Indo-European Etymological Dictionary, Leiden University 2002, pp. 214-217.
8 Op. cit., pp. 831-832.
1 Antonios Hatzis: Elle, Hellas, Hellene. Athens
1935–1936.
2 Hesiod, Catalogue of Women, frr. 9, 10(a) OCT.
3 Aristotle, Meteorologica I, xiv.
4 Panagiotis
Christou: The Adventures of
the National Names of the Greeks. Thessalonike, 1964; J. Juthner: Hellenen und Barbaren. Leipzig,
1923.
1 Hesiod, Theogony, book XIX, line 176.
1 Hesiod, Theogony, 124–125.
2 Timothy
Gantz: Early Greek Myth: A Guide to Literary and Artistic Sources. Johns
Hopkins Press, 1996, p. 4.
3 Timothy
Gantz: Early Greek Myth: A Guide to Literary and Artistic Sources I-II. Johns
Hopkins University Press, 1996, pp. 446, 447.
4 David Hunt: Legends of
the Caucasus. London: Saqi Books, 2012, p. 220;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclops.
1 Aristotle, Meteorologica I. xiv.
2 Eusebius, Praeparatio Evangelica, 10, 10.
3 Theophilus, bishop of Antioch, Apologia ad Autolycum.
4 Herodotus, Historiai,
I, 57; II, 51, 7-12.